IVF Research - In vitro Fertilization, Infertility, Treatment, Procedure, Pregnancy, Success Rates

IVF Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about IVF, including details on in vitro fertilization, infertility, treatment, procedure, pregnancy, success rates.


IVF Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About IVF

Books on IVF

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Vitrification of preimplantation genetically diagnosed human blastocysts and its contribution to the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle by using a closed device.

Escribá MJ, Zulategui JF, Galán A, Mercader A, Remohí J, de los Santos MJ

Clinical Embryology Laboratory, Instituto Universitario IVI, Valencia, Spain. mjescriba@ivi.es

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the survival rate and clinical results of our vitrification procedure on preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) blastocysts and to calculate its actual contribution to the reproductive outcome per cycle. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: University Institute IVI, Valencia, Spain. PATIENT(S): Patients who requested cryotransfer of surplus PGD blastocysts after failed fresh elective transfer. INTERVENTION(S): Retrospectively collected data during 2 years of experience with blastocyst vitrification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures were the following: blastocyst recovery and survival; cryotransfer cancellation; and the implantation, pregnancy (PR), and ongoing-pregnancy rates. The secondary outcome measure was cumulative ongoing PR (COPR). RESULT(S): Cocultured vitrified PGD blastocysts were recovered and progressed in development after overnight culture (survival rate) at rates comparable to those of non-PGD blastocysts (49% and 42%, respectively). After transfer to 64% of patients, no statistical differences were found between PGD and non-PGD blastocyst groups concerning the following: PR (44% vs. 37%), implantation rate (40% vs. 27%), and ongoing-pregnancy rate (32% vs. 37%). Moreover, blastocyst vitrification significantly increased the COPR in both PGD and non-PGD cycles, from 47% (62/133) to 53% (70/133) and from 45% (24/53) to 53% (28/53), respectively. CONCLUSION(S): A preimplantation genetic diagnosis blastocyst vitrification procedure showed survival rates and improvements on the COPR that were comparable to those in non-PGD blastocyst cycles. Moreover, vitrification of biopsied and diagnosed embryos at the more advanced stages instead of at earlier cleavage stages is presented as an attractive strategy to consider in PGD programs.

Published 14 April 2008 in Fertil Steril, 89(4): 840-6.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 IVF Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



IVF Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)



IVF Books

The Infertility Treadmill: Feminist Ethics, Personal Choice, and the Use of Reproductive Technologies (Studies in Social Medicine)

The Infertility Treadmill: Feminist Ethics, Personal Choice, and the Use of Reproductive Technologies (Studies in Social Medicine)